build vertical · smart wallet ux

Smart wallet UX.

quotable answer

Smart-wallet UX on LUKSO — session keys, scoped delegation, recovery, contract signature verification — uses LSP6 Key Manager (standardized permission bitfield with target/selector/data-key scoping), LSP11 Basic Social Recovery (guardian voting), LSP20 Call Verification (inline validator), and ERC-1271 (contract signature validation for Sign-in-with-Ethereum and off-chain orders). Every account speaks the same permission vocabulary, so cross-wallet session portability is possible in principle — versus ERC-4337's per-vendor validator SDKs.

A smart wallet UX is a permission graph, not a connect button. LSP6 is the vocabulary for that graph — controllers, permissions, allowed calls, allowed data keys — and LSP0 is the account those controllers act on.

When this vertical fits

You’re shipping anything where “the wallet has full account control” is the wrong default: session keys for an app, scoped controllers for a marketplace integration, recovery controllers a user never touches day-to-day, multi-device flows where each device gets its own permission set.

The minimum stack

  • LSP0 as the account contract
  • LSP6 for permissions per controller
  • LSP14 for safer ownership rotation when controllers can’t just be re-permissioned
  • LSP20 if you want controllers to call the account directly (not through the Key Manager wrapper)

Reading list.

A curated path — problem → standard → migration.

  1. [ 01 ] problem Wallets don't know how to ask for less
  2. [ 02 ] problem Recovery shouldn't be one phrase to lose
  3. [ 03 ] problem An EOA is one key for everything
  4. [ 04 ] LSP0 ERC-725 Account
  5. [ 05 ] LSP6 Key Manager
  6. [ 06 ] compare EOA vs Universal Profile

Continue at docs.lukso.tech.